Irish Catholic child-fucking
The latest Irish Catholic child-fucking scandal is but another ignoble chapter in the noisome history of religion.
Who can possibly still have respect for the Catholic Church – for a Catholic!?
Yet, one can probably overcome the revulsion of bad breath and the piss-reeking priestly cock in one’s mouth… but what about the mind-fucking?
Religion is responsible for the reprehensible reality that children grow up to be adults believing in fairies and gods – the greatest possible crime against humanity.
Religion is the single most noisome aberration ever ideated by fallible man.
Religion is evil incarnate.
But don’t you see, Nathan? Beatings, slave labour and sexual abuses – these are just earthly transgressions, ones against the flesh, that will be made good for in the hereinafter.
Yeah, right.
And in any case, it’s once again not my religion.
Yeah, right.
Con-Tester
May 21, 2009 at 8:46 am
It’s called “being filled with the Holy Spirit.”
Swallow or go to hell!
Morne Alberts
May 21, 2009 at 9:00 am
More child-fucking, this time at the hand of the Dutch reformed god. Done with less finesse but considerably more immediacy and permanence.
Con-Tester
May 21, 2009 at 8:08 pm
I’ve always said that if “God” reveals his omnipotent self to me – arrive on my doorstep, look me in the eye and shake me by the hand, I’ll “believe” and become his greatest disciple. I’ve said that I wouldn’t be foolhardy.
Well, fuck that.
If “God” did arrive on my doorstep, I’ll kick him in the balls. What kind of a fucked-up doos “allows” a father to drive his 4×4 over his children!?
It’s the “Devil”!?
So ‘ol Nick is more powerful than this idiot “God” after all!
“God” is a sick cunt.
Arn’t y’all just elated that “God” – mercifully – does not exist!?
Nathan Bond
May 22, 2009 at 6:07 am
Try as I might, I cannot conjure up a cogent “free will” defence for such an occurrence. Perhaps one of this blog’s more theologically adept contributors would care to offer one since I have it on much weighty because-I-say-so authority that I am sadly naïve concerning this god’s allegedly subtle and graceful ways.
But I agree: it looks very much like this god’s an aspiring Norman Bates. The Norman Bates character is based on Ed Gein whose Wikipedia entry emphasises his strict Lutheran, bible-centred upbringing.
Con-Tester
May 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Obviously it’s a warning for our impending doom in 2011.
Repent now or your children will be run over.
Morne Alberts
May 23, 2009 at 11:55 am
By all reports these were the children of God-fearing parents. And fearful the parents should be, too! Horrified, to be sure.
If “God” can “allow” such tragedy to befall “His own”, imagine what “God” could do to people like me!? Perhaps I should repent and minimize the certain damage?
Nathan Bond
May 23, 2009 at 1:03 pm
No Nathan, please don’t repent. Who else will bring such necessary vigour to the good fight? If it comes to it, I’ll shovel embers right beside you in th’ fiery pit o’ ’ell.
More tellingly, “[I]magine what “God” could do to people like me!?.” Indeed, and it’s revealing that s/he’s such a complete drip about this retribution and vengeance business. Pity also that s/he’s such a gutless prevaricator. Even an unremitting tyrant would be preferable to this wishy-washy excuse for a deity. At least you’d know where you stand.
Con-Tester
May 23, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Oooh, infighting, eh!? Who’d’ve thought it. Let’s hope he’s not a closet paedophile. Elephant-in-the-room and closing-the-stable-door-after-the-horse-has-bolted notwithstanding, the Kirk is obviously not sufficiently impressed with Leviticus and Deuteronomy. One might reasonably ask why, seeing as one is dealing with The One Eternal and Immutable Truth™® (℗ & © 325 CE*).
————————
* As amended 381, 431, 449, 451, 553, 680-681, 692, 754, 787, 869-870, 879-880, 1123, 1139, 1179, 1215, 1245, 1274, 1311-1312, 1341-1351, 1409, 1414-1418, 1423-1424, 1431-1445, 1512-1514, 1545-1563, 1672, 1870-1960, 1962-1965 CE et seq.
Con-Tester
May 24, 2009 at 7:25 pm
You, as usual, cannot find one place, in the Bible where Jesus sought to preach child abuse ect.
It is therefore clear that you are just trying to create a cloud of no substance at all and only fools will fall for your nonsense.
Hans Matthysen
May 27, 2009 at 9:46 pm
And you, as usual, cannot present anything either consequent or coherent, let alone both.
Con-Tester
May 28, 2009 at 5:26 pm
Con-tester, I have, but you are to blind to see.
Hans Matthysen
June 4, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Only in your own very odd little world, Hans Matthysen. Only in your own very odd little world.
Con-Tester
June 5, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Con-Tester, at least it would appear that you realize, that we all live in our own world. Take note, as that is the world that changes, when one allows God, in ones life. (Peace on earth and good will towards man)
Hans Matthysen
August 6, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Religion. Postmodernism. Different details. Same way of saying, “Reality? Whazzat?”
Con-Tester
August 7, 2009 at 9:26 pm
Con-Tester, no further comment.
Hans Matthysen
August 21, 2009 at 10:36 pm
Promise? Because I doubt it.
Con-Tester
August 22, 2009 at 8:25 pm